Taking the insured amount of 5,000 yuan as an example, "This is the amount of medicine used for outpatient reimbursement in one year after analyzing big data, portraits, and the entire population, which is about 3,000-5,000 yuan." between.

So what advantages do short video entrepreneurs have over traditional production companies and advertising companies in fighting for this part of business? There are three points: Short video entrepreneurs have their own distribution channels. Even if they don’t have many fans, it won’t have much impact, but it’s still better than traditional production companies and advertising companies. Traditional production companies with no channels at all are better; even if the company has no plans to publish, short video entrepreneurs have released their own content for a long time, and their popularity is even better than that of some very professional institutions, and some customers often come through We-media channels take the initiative to contact them; short video entrepreneurs regard production services more as a "subsidy" for entrepreneurship, so they do not pursue high profit margins and often have cost advantages.document.writeln('Follow entrepreneurship, e-commerce, and webmasters, scan the WeChat QR code of A5 Entrepreneurship Network, and draw prizes regularly.

Mistake No. 1 Everyone thinks, who is the most enthusiastic person calling on everyone to make short videos today? It is the platforms, Toutiao, Weibo, and Tencent.If what is being sold is not knowledge but hamburgers, clothes, and cosmetics, one will be legally responsible for selling fake goods. However, it is a pity that these fake knowledge are put up for sale in broad daylight with a price tag, and no one seems to care.Of course, you may say that 10% of projects can make money, and there are so many starting businesses, isn’t it a bubble?

Similarly, advertising is also a proven business model in the self-media and content entrepreneurship circles.Of course, it doesn’t mean that unpopular things have no chance, but encouraging everyone to make popular and in-demand things is definitely not a mistake, right? Mistake No. 2 As a content product, there are only three ways to make money. , the first is called advertising, the second is called e-commerce, and the third is called knowledge payment.

There are countless other jokes that have made money, so I won’t list them all.

But this does not mean that online games have no business model, and hot pot restaurants and clothing stores have no business model.  Legend: In December 2016, Sun Zhengyi promised Trump to invest 50 billion U.S. dollars in the United States (1/2 the amount of the Vision Fund), creating 50,000 new jobs.

It is undeniable that in early-stage venture capital projects, VCs who invest hundreds of millions of dollars usually require a seat on the company’s board of directors, but for the Vision Fund with a scale of up to 100 billion U.S. dollars, such investment amount only accounts for 10% of the total size of the fund. 1‰, not requiring the appointment of directors also sounds reasonable.Therefore, after originally planning to invest in the "father of Android" Rubin's smartphone startup project, Masayoshi Son also promised that Softbank's Japanese subsidiary will provide strong marketing support for Rubin's high-end smartphones in Japan. investors cannot provide resource support.

Sun Zhengyi will not be ignorant of industry rules, but why would he still do this? According to people familiar with the matter, Sun Zhengyi tore up the US$100 million investment plan partly because of Sun Zhengyi’s relationship with Apple ("the father of Android" Rubin) The relationship between friends and businessmen) is getting closer and closer.For example, people familiar with the matter revealed that the Vision Fund has priority for all SoftBank projects with an investment of more than US$100 million. This arrangement is conducive to the raising of new funds and the protection of interests, but the interests of other funds may be adversely affected; how to balance Interests between fund managers (GP) and investors (LPs): Even if GPs use other funds to invest in LPs, even if they can avoid the situation where industry LPs are forced to fund competing products, it will be very difficult for them to raise new funds next time. It is difficult to face industry LPs directly. Offending such investors may also lose the opportunity to "take over" through industry LPs acquisitions or co-investments as funds. Therefore, it is not ruled out that GPs with a "long-term vision" may face abandoning such investments driving force.